Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Effect of vitamin K2 on bone mineral density and serum cathepsin K in female osteoporosis patients

Gu Yuanyang, Xing Runlin, Xu Bo, Fan Donghua, Mao Jun

Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Hanzhong Road 155#, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210029, China;

For correspondence:-  Mao Jun   Email: z005977@163.com

Accepted: 30 December 2018        Published: 31 January 2019

Citation: Yuanyang G, Runlin X, Bo X, Donghua F, Jun M. Effect of vitamin K2 on bone mineral density and serum cathepsin K in female osteoporosis patients. Trop J Pharm Res 2019; 18(1):181-185 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v18i1.27

© 2019 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the influence of vitamin K2 on bone mineral density, bone metabolism and serum tissue protease K (cathepsin K) in female patients with osteoporosis.
Method: A total of 210 osteoporosis patients in Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine who met the inclusion criteria were selected from January 2017 to January 2018. The patients were randomly divided into vitamin K2 group, strontium renate group and blank control group (70 patients/group). Strontium ranelate group was orally given 2 g of strontium ranelate daily, while vitamin K2 group received 15 mg of Gulikang capsule 3 times a day. Bone mineral density (BMD) and serum osteocalcin (BGP), β-collagen degradation product (β-crosslaps), type I procollagen amino terminal pro-peptide (PINP), cathepsin K (cathe K) and TRAP were measured prior to drug treatment, and six months after surgery, using standard procedures.
Results: Relative to the blank control, hip and lumbar spine density of vitamin K2 and strontium ranelate groups increased to varying degrees. Strontium ranelate group had significantly higher bone mineral density (BMD) than any other groups (p < 0.05), and also had the lowest osteoclast activity (β-crosslaps and TRAP) and the highest osteogenic activity (BGP and PINP). On the other hand, osteoclast and osteogenic activities increased significantly (p < 0.05) in the vitamin K2 group.
Conclusion: Appropriate vitamin K2 treatment improves BMD in the hip and waist of women with osteoporosis by promoting osteogenic activity, and by reducing osteoclast activity and cathepsin K expression.

Keywords: Osteoporosis, Bone mineral density, Strontium ranelate, Vitamin K2

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates